Tag Archives: apple

Symbian Says, "Hello World!"

2010 will mark the tipping point for Mobile Technology. Mobile operating systems have taken a large leap in defining an empowered future by abandoning the old ways of “what’s our’s is our’s and you can’t have any” to turning the other cheek and going “open source”.

Yesterday marked the entry of yet another big player, the world of the Symbian OS. Opening its doors to the developer world, the platform will surely be going over a radical make-over, even if it only involves the acquisition of “accessories” in terms of apps.

But what does this all mean? Why didn’t the Symbian Gods open their pearly gates earlier? Why now?

Did Android have something to do with influencing this “turn over a new leaf” or ?

Right before our social media consciousness, we are witnessing the future of mobile unfold into an exciting platform of possibilities. Where this will lead only time will tell.

One thing is for sure. If we’ve ever been really connected, we will be even more connected now, in ways that will make us think “Now, this is more like it.”

Never mind that Apple decided to call their new baby (the iPAD) a name which makes women cringe and “LOL” in such cynical ways. Never mind that Google is handing out FREE Nexus Ones to as many anxious and ambitious developers worldwide. Never mind the the Symbian OS has emerged from an obviously “productive” brain storming session .. the question is, “How will Microsoft’s new phone, fare when entering the game?”

Apple Tablet. What Is It Good For?

It was 7:20 am Central European Time +1 and I was still on West Coast (as in L.A.) time. No, I haven’t been out of Germany since I landed here in 2007. I just have real weird hours.

Because of these weird hours, I was able to catch Sascha Pallenberg of netbooknews.com ‘s Friendfeed post:

The world doesn’t need an Apple tablet, or any other |.. Betanews http://bit.ly/5QvwaM

I was intrigued, so naturally I clicked the link.

… an Apple tablet — no matter how innovative — faces three distinctive market challenges: The greater desirability of smaller devices; overlapping functionality with devices above and below it; and functionality too limited without a physical keyboard. The question everyone should ask: What would you use an Apple tablet, or any other, for?

Of course, the cartoon was inspired by the bolded sentence in the above quote.

When I heard the rumor last  year that Apple may come out with their own tablet I wasn’t too excited. You have to know, that I was a professed Mac-Addict. I still am, only my attention has also wandered over to the Android side of the digital life. I wasn’t too excited by an Apple tablet, because frankly, I wouldn’t really know what to do with one.

I still have my old 12 inch Apple Power Book, a Dell XPS m1210 (that’s been put out of commission temporarily), a 10″ Eee PC 1002HA, a Nokia n800 that is waiting for an Android port and other stuff .. that I can’t imagine wanting something else that would allow me to do what I already do with the other devices. Mind you, it IS an Apple brand, but, as the business of tech continues to grow … lines are starting to be blurred, just a little.

I can do pretty much the same thing on each of the devices that I already have, give or take, video editing, gaming and running Second Life. But I don’t video edit, game and use Second Life everyday. The only four things I ever do everyday is browse, check email, tweet and facebook. I can do all four on all the devices. An Apple tablet isn’t enough to  get me excited. Then again, I’d have to really get my hands on one to put that sentence to rest.

Even if I did get my hands on one, I’d be worried about the price. And even if Jobs sets up a pretty alluring price point, I’d still be worried if whether or not Jobs will announce a tablet upgrade in the next 3 months of the first tablet launch, that would be much better and probably the same price as the first. Then again, that’s the tech business for you, but more so, Apple’s m.o. (mode of operation).

2010 will certainly be an interesting year, if not a redundant kind of year for devices in general. How many more eBooks will come out? How many more types of netbooks? Luxury tech brands, like Apple, Nokia, whatever are seeing more and more replicas. Not to say that other devices are FAKE, like the fake Rolex watches we can buy for $20 dollars off the sidewalk (and bargain down to $5), but now that Google’s stepped into the Device creating game, it’s really starting to level off the playing field, or rather, upset it.

When I think of Google’s Android OS, I can’t help but think of a virus. An entity that invades hosts and changes the hosts m.o. to suit their own agenda. When I speak of virus, I speak of one that is more positive than destructive. Either way you look at it, Android is definitely invading the mobile and device sphere forcing the big players need to re-asses their game play.

And the word tablet? I’m not a fan of that word at all. Being an ex-nurse, “tablet” makes me think of pills or Moses coming down from Mount whatever .. with two tablets at his side. Hmmmm.

Hypothetically speaking, since there has been no solid confirmation of Apple launching a tablet this January ….

What would you do? Would you consider getting an Apple tablet or any other tablet for that matter? Do you care?

2010's Smartphone Landscape

I’ve been touting in pretty much this past month’s blog posts that we need not pit Android phones against iPhones. Why can’t we do both? Why do we always  need to choose teams? Why does  it always have to be a battle?

Today’s Android Twitter stream was inundated with links to an article on eMarketer, “How Alike Are Android and iPhone Users?”

Awareness of the Android mobile operating system is rising, and users have a lot in common with iPhone fans, according to research from comScore and Compete.

Bingo! It’s happening and we’re slowly seeing signs of the parallel rise of both mobile operating systems.

I for one, know quite a few Mac users that  have jumped on the Android Band Wagon and have NOT deserted their Apple products at all. They live, guilt free and have the best of both worlds. The rules are changing people and one rule is —> we don’t have to follow any rules!

Whether or not comScore‘s and Compete‘s research are accurate, the fact remains that the numbers are changing and we’ll definitely be seeing more and more research firms grinding out more data that will give us a better picture of where the two celebrity mobile operating systems fare.

The cartoon above, was originally created for an upcoming article on Mashable and was entitled “iCompromise”.

I’ve created two more updated cartoons to compliment eMarketer’s article.


Android and Apple? iDO both.

I’ve always said (like many others before me) that to compare Apple’s iPhone to any Android phone is like comparing apples to oranges. People still pit the respective app stores as obvious rivals and understandably so. I suppose coming up with ways in which Android differs from Apple or the ways in which Apple’s iPhone is superior to Android makes for good blog content.

Let’s take a journey however, to the abstract recesses of our minds. Let’s imagine that Google’s Android and Apple’s iPhone courageously go where no other two rival operating systems have gone before (not to my knowledge anyway) – onward into the future, hand in hand (sort of).

This isn’t the first time I came up with such an absurd thought. I did imagine a scenario that involved Steve Jobs announcing at a future MacWorld Expo .. something about Android. That didn’t fly to well with a few readers. No one really commented on my insanity, but I did get a few interesting DM’s.

Having been a Mac Addict for 23 years and now a closet one, I understand the strength of the Apple brand. Apple is a brand that has backed it’s fruit logo with a well disciplined engine. Its strength lies in their strict control over everything that comes out of the Cupertino building, so to speak. In Apple’s more youthful days, one of their missions was to change the way the computer industry was being handled. Their number one opponent was IBM and Apple wanted to do everything in their power to be different from IBM.

Times have changed and thinkers have evolved. What IBM represented 20 something years ago and what Apple wanted to be known for is almost similar to what Apple represents now, in context to Google’s open source operating system. Apple now appears as the old school, controlling entity and Google .. errr, Android, opens up a free to do what I want mentality (sort of).

Because history does repeat itself and because man seldom ever learns from his past, partly because he is so focused on finding ways to increase the “bottom line” and only meeting the needs of a few select target markets, I say it’s time for a change.

There is strength in numbers and two heads are definitely better than one. Steve Jobs may never adapt anything Android into Apple’s environment and Android may never be a tightly controlled power engine (it’s open source) but that doesn’t mean we have to be pitted against one or the other.

We should all feel opportuned to be able to have both devices sitting side by side on our desks or even occupying the same pocket space on our person. I will no longer stay the closet mac addict that I am. I will happily move forward embracing the fact that I LOVE my Apple products as much as I LOVE the Android OS.

In this case, I can have my Apple and Donut or Eclair or Flan and eat them too!

So if anyone asks me which I prefer more, Android or Apple I’ll just simply say, iDO both.